Cáncer de seno y hormonoterapia. Estado actual

Autores/as

  • José Joaquín Caicedo M. Clínica de seno de la Clínica del Country. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Elías Quintero Clínica de seno de la Clínica del Country. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • José Fernando Robledo Clínica de seno de la Clínica del Country. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Fernando Perry Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Claudia Ramírez Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Carlos Duarte Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Javier Ángel Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Sandra Díaz Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Alejandro Orozco Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Luis Fernando Viaña Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Eduardo Torregrosa Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Fabio Torres Clínica de seno. Hospital Universitario Fundación Santafé. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Ramiro Sánchez Clínica del seno. Bogotá, Colombia.

Palabras clave:

agentes antineoplásicos hormonales, cáncer de seno, receptores estrogénicos, quimioterapia adyuvante

Resumen

El manejo del cáncer de seno es multidisciplinario e involucra la cirugía, la quimioterapia, la radioterapia y la hormonoterapia. La hormonoterapia es un tratamiento muy antiguo para el manejo efectivo del cáncer de seno hormono-sensible. Cerca de 75% de las pacientes expresan receptores hormonales en el tumor y el estándar de manejo ha sido con antiestrógenos como el tamoxifeno, que se viene usando desde hace más de 25 años en ensayos clínicos con buena respuesta, mejorando la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (SLE) y la supervivencia total (ST) de las pacientes, tanto en mujeres premenopáusicas como postmenopáusicas; por los efectos secundarios sobre endometrio y coagulación, se han venido desarrollando nuevas drogas llamadas inhibidores de aromatasa, que han sido comparados con el tamoxifeno en el estado metastásico y en adyuvancia, con mejores resultados de supervivencia libre de enfermedad con menos efectos secundarios sobre endometrio y menos eventos trombóticos, aunque aumentan el riesgo de osteoporosis y fracturas con su uso prolongado. El uso de inhibidores de aromatasa se restringe a pacientes posmenopáusicas. Las pacientes premenopáusicas requieren algún tipo de bloqueo ovárico para su uso. Se hace una revisión de la evolución del tratamiento en estos escenarios y en los nuevos terrenos de neoadyuvancia y quimioprevención.

Se considera que toda paciente con cáncer de seno que tenga alguna expresión de receptores hormonales (más de 1% por inmunohistoquímica) se beneficia de hormonoterapia; el tamoxifeno por 5 años es una excelente droga para ser utilizada en casos de muy buen pronóstico, pero cuando está contraindicado o cuando existen factores de riesgo para recaída local o sistémica, las pacientes posmenopáusicas con tumores hormonosensibles, se benefician de un inhibidor de aromatasa en adyuvancia primaria o hacer el cambio después de 2, 3 ó 5 años de tamoxifeno. La evidencia actual muestra que el tratamiento se puede prolongar más allá de los 5 a 10 años.

Este es un artículo de revisión de la hormonoterapia desde sus inicios hasta las recomendaciones actuales en los diferentes escenarios.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

José Joaquín Caicedo M., Clínica de seno de la Clínica del Country. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno de la Clínica del Country. Bogotá, Colombia.

Elías Quintero, Clínica de seno de la Clínica del Country. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno de la Clínica del Country. Bogotá, Colombia.

José Fernando Robledo, Clínica de seno de la Clínica del Country. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno de la Clínica del Country. Bogotá, Colombia.

Fernando Perry, Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Claudia Ramírez, Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Carlos Duarte, Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

 Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Javier Ángel, Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Sandra Díaz, Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Alejandro Orozco, Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Luis Fernando Viaña, Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Eduardo Torregrosa, Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujanos Mastólogos de Bogotá. Clínica de seno. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá, Colombia.

Fabio Torres, Clínica de seno. Hospital Universitario Fundación Santafé. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujano Mastólogo de Bogotá. Clínica de seno. Hospital Universitario Fundación Santafé. Bogotá, Colombia.

Ramiro Sánchez, Clínica del seno. Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirujano Mastólogo de Bogotá. Clínica del seno. Bogotá, Colombia.

Referencias bibliográficas

1. Beatson GW. On the treatment of inoperable cases of carcinoma of the mamma: suggestions for a new method of treatment with illustrative cases. Lancet, 1896; 2: 104-107 y 162-165.

2. Huggins C, Stevens RE, Hodges CV. Studies on prostatic cancer. II. The effects of castration on advanced carcinoma of the prostate gland. Arch Surg 1941; 43: 209-223.

3. Huggins C, Bergenstal DM. Inhibition of human mammary and prostatic cancer by adrenalectomy. Cancer Res 1952; 12: 134-141.

4. Dao TL. Ablation therapy for hormone- dependent tumors. Ann Rev Med 1972; 23: 1-18.

5. Lett H. An analysis of ninety-nine cases of inoperable carcinoma of the breast treated by oophorectomy. Lancet 1905; i: 227-228.

6. Pearson OH, Ray BS. Results of hypophysectomy in the treatment of metastatic mammary carcinoma. Cancer 1959: 12: 85.

7. Santen RJ, Santner SJ, Tilsen-Mallett N, Rosen HR, Samojlik E, Velhuis JD. In vivo pharmacologic studies of aminogluthetimide as an aromatase inhibitor. Cancer Res 1982: 42 (suppl): 3353Ss-3359s.

8. Griffiths CT, Hall TC, Saba Z, et al. Preliminary trial of aminoglutethimide in breast cancer. Cancer 1973; 32: 31.

9. Folca PJ, Glascock RF, Irvine WT. Studies with tritium-labeled hexoestrol in advanced breast cancer. Lancet 1961; II: 796-798.

10. Jensen EV, Polley TZ, Smith S, Block GE, Ferguson DJ, De Sombre ER. Prediction of hormone dependence in human breast cancer. In: McGuire Wl, Carbone PO, Vollmer EP. Estrogen receptors in human breast cancer. New York: Raven Press 1975; 37-56.

11. Geisler J, King N, Anker G, et al. In vivo inhibition of aromatization by exemestane, a novel irreversible aromatase inhibitor in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4: 2089-2093.

12. Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomized controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 1993-2000.

13. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1371-1378.

14. Ayes DF, Robertson JFR. Endocrine therapy of breast cancer. Martin Dunitz ED. 1st EDT. London, 2002.

15. Conn PM, et al. Gonadotropin releasing hormone: molecular and cell biology. Physiology and clinical applications. Phy Proc 1984; 43: 2351.

16. Ronier C, Spelsbery TC. Ovarian steroid action: mechanisms and models. Ann Rev Physiology 1989; 51: 653.

17. Miller WR, O'Neal JS. The importance of local synthesis of estrogens within the breast. Steroids 1998; 50: 537.

18. Simpson ER, Zhao Y, et al. Aromatase expression in health and disease. Rec Prog Hormone Res 1997; 52: 185.

19. Simpson ER, Merrill JC, et al. Regulation of estrogen biosynthesis by human adipose cells. Endocr Rev 1989; 10: 138.

20. Simpson ER, Mahendroo MS, et al. Tissue specific promoters regulate aromatase cytochrome P450 expression. Clin Chem 1993; 39: 317.

21. Sasano H, Jarada N. Intratumoral aromatase in human breast. Endocr Rev 1998; 19: 593.

22. Welshons WV, Lieberman ME, et al. Nuclear localization of unoccupied oestrogen receptors. Nature: 1984; 307.

23. Kuiper GG, et al. Cloning of a novel receptor expressed in rat prostate and ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 5925.

24. Shughrue PJ, Lane MV, et al. Comparative distribution of estrogen receptor alpha and beta mRNA in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 1997; 388: 507.

25. Hall JM, McDonnell DP. The estrogen receptor betaisoform (ERbeta) of the human estrogen receptor modulates ERalpha transcriptional activity and is a key regulator of the cellular response to estrogens and antiestrogens. Endocrinology 1999; 140: 5566.

26. Palmieri C, et al. Estrogen receptor beta in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2002; 9: 1.

27. Jones N. Structure and function of transcription factors. Semin Cancer Biol 1990; 1: 5.

28. Chalbos D, Rochefort H. Dual effects of the progestin R5020 on proteins released by the T47D human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 1984; 259: 1231.

29. Horwitz KB, McGuire WL. Estrogen control of progesterone receptor in human breast cancer: correlation with nuclear processing of estrogen receptor. J Biol Chem 1978; 253: 2223.

30. Riggs BL, Hartmann LC. Selective estrogen-receptor modulators - mechanisms of action and application to clinical practice. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 618-629.

31. Osborne CK. Drug therapy: tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1609-1618.

32. Balfour JA, Goa KL. Raloxifene. Drugs Aging 1998; 12: 335-341.

33. Johnston SR, Endocrine manipulation in advanced breast cancer: recent advances with SERM therapies. Clin Cancer Research 2001; 7: 4376s-87s discussion 4411-4412.

34. Cummings SR, Eckert S, Krueger KA, et al. The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results from the MORE randomized trial. multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation. JAMA 1999; 281: 2189-2197.

35. Dauvois S, White R, Parker MG. The antiestrogen ICI 182780 disrupts estrogen receptor nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. J Cell Sci 1993; 106: 1377-1388.

36. Howell A. Preliminary experience with pure antiestrogens. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 4369s-75s; discussion 4411s-2s.

37. Smith IE, Harris AL, Morgan M, et al. tamoxifen vs aminoglutethimide in advanced breast carcinoma: a randomized cross-over trial. Br Med J (Cli Res Ed) 1981; 283: 1432-1434.

38. Pritchard KI. The role of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors/inactivators in postmenopausal patients. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 4356s-9s; discussion 4411s-2s.

39. Grodin JM, Siiteri PK, MacDonald PC. Source of estrogen production in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1973; 36: 207-214.

40. Assikis VJ, Buzdar A. Recent advances in aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2002; 29: 120: 120-128.

41. Furr BJ. Pharmacology of the luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue, Zoladex. Horm Res 1989; 32: 86-92.

42. Pritchard KI. Ovarian ablation as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. Cancer Treat Res 1998; 94: 158-180.

43. Gregory EJ, Cohen SC, Oines DW, Mims CH. Megestrol acetate therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3: 155-160.

44. Haddow A, Watkinson JM, Paterson E. influence of synthetic estrogens on advanced malignant disease. Br Med J 1944; 2: 393-398.

45. Steroid receptors in breast cancer: an NIH Consensus Development Conference, Bethesda, Maryland, June 27-29, 1979, Cancer 1980; 46 (suppl 12): 2759. Schmid P, et al. Oncology 2002; 63: 309-316.

46. Kiang DT, Kennedy BJ. Tamoxifen therapy in advanced breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1977; 87: 687.

47. Miller W, Ingle J. Endocrin Therapy in Breast Cancer 2002.

48. Early Breast Cancer Trialist´ Collaborative Group: Ovarian ablation for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD000485, 2000.

49. Lebowitz P, Zujewski J. Hormonal therapy of breast cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 2003; 27: 278-322.

50. Namer N. New directions in hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer. European Society for Medical Oncology 2002; 69-72.

51. Klijn JGM, Blamey RW. Combined tamoxifen and LHRH agonist versus LHRH agonist alone in premenopausal advanced breast cancer: a meta-analysis of four randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 343-353.

52. Buzdar A, Howell A. Advances in aromatase inhibition: clinical efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 2620-2635.

53. Carlson RW, Henderson C. Sequential hormonal therapy for metastatic breast cancer after adjuvant tamoxifen or anastrozole. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003: 80 (suppl. 1): S19-S26.

54. Nabholtz JM, Buzdar A. Anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen as first line therapy for advanced breast cancer in post-menopausal women: results of a North-American multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2002; 18: 3758-3776.

55. Bonneterre J, Robertson J, et al. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 668 post-menopausal women: results of the target study. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3748-3757.

56. Mouridsen H, Gershanovich M, et al. Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first line therapy for post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the international letrozole breast cancer group. J Clin Oncol 2000; 19: 2596-2606.

57. Program and abstracts of the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; June 5-8, 2004; New Orleans Louisiana.

58. Lonning PE, Bajetta E, et al. Activity of exemestane in metastatic breast cancer after failure of nonsteroidal aromatasa inhibitors: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 2234-2244.

59. Pritchard K. Debating the issues: should we bury tamoxifen? In: Meds cape conference coverage, based on select sessions at the Four European Breast Cancer Conference 2004; Medscape.com.

60. Howell A, Robertson JFR, et al. Fulvestrant is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endrocrine treatment. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3396-3403.

61. Osborne CK, Pippen J, et al. Double-blind randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: results of North American trial. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3386-3395.

62. Rose C, Vtoraya O, Pluzanska A, Caicedo JJ, et al. Letrozole (Femara) vs. anastrozole (Arimidex): second-line treatment in postmenopausal women. Eur J Cancer.

63. Piccart-Gebhart MJ. New stars in the sky of treatment for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1140-1142.

64. Baum M, Buzdar AU, Cuzick J, et al. Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomized trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2131-2139. Erratum in: Lancet 2002; 360: 1520

65. With advanced breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21: 34a.

66. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S, et al. A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1793-1802.

67. Lohrisch C, Paridaens R, Dirix LY, et al. No adverse impact on serum lipids of the irreversible aromatase inactivator aromasin (exemestane [E]) in 1st line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC): companion study to a European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (Breast Group) trial with Pharmacias' Upjohn. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001; 20: 43a.

68. Goss PE, Grynpas MD, Josse R, et al. The effects of the steroidal aromatase inactivator exemestane on bone and lipid metabolism in the ovariectomized rat. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 69: 224.

69. Dewar J, Nabholtz JM, Bonneterre J, et al. The effect of anastrozole (Arimidex) on plasma lipids-data from a randomized comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000; 64: 51.

70. Elisaf MS, Bairaktari ET, Nicolaides C, et al. Effect of letrozole on the lipid profile in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37: 1510-1513.

71. Goss PE, Cheung AM, Lowery C, et al. Comparison of the effects of exemestane, 17-hydroxyexemestane, and letrozole on bone and lipid metabolism in the ovariectomized rat. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 76 (suppl 1): S107.

72. Goss PE, Strasser K. Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 881-894.

73. Beatson GT. On the treatment of inoperable cases of carcinoma of the mamma: suggestions for a new method of treatment, with illustrative cases. Lancet 1896; 2: 104-107.

74. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet, 1998; 351: 1451-1467.

75. The ATAC Trialists' Group. Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomized trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2131-2139.

76. Winer E, Hudis C, Burstein H, Chlebowski R, Ingle J, Edge S. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2002. J Clin Oncol, 2002; 20: 3317-3327.

77. Fisher B, Dignam J, Bryant J, et al. Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 1529-1542.

78. Coombes RC, Hall E, Gibson LJ, Paridaens R, Jassem J, et al. the Intergroup Exemestane Study. A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1081-1092.

79. Ingle JN, Krook JE, Green SJ, et al. Randomized trial of bilateral oophorectomy versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 178-185.

80. Love RR, Cameron L, Connell BL, Leventhal H. Symptoms associated with tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 1842-1847.

81. Pritchard KI, Paterson AHG, Paul NA, Zee B, Fine S, Pater J. Increased thromboembolic complications with concurrent tamoxifen and chemotherapy in a randomized trial of adjuvant therapy for women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2731-2737.

82. Smith IE, Dowsett M. Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2431-2442.

83. Jonat W, Kaufmann M, Sauerbrei W, et al. Goserelin versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: the 'Zoladex' Early Breast Cancer Research Association study. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20, 4628-4635.

84. Kaufmann M, Jonat W, Blamey R, Cuzick J. Survival analyses from the ZEBRA study: goserelin (ZoladexTM) versus CMF in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 1711-1717.

85. Jakesz R, Hausmaninger H, Kubista E, et al. Randomized adjuvant T trial of tamoxifen and goserelin versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: evidence for the superiority treatment with endocrine blockade in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive breast cancer. Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Tria l 5. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20, 4621-4627.

86. Fenecy M, Bates T, MacRae K, et al. Late follow-up of a randomized trial of surgery plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone in women aged over 70 years whit operable breast cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 699-704.

87. Bates T, Riley DL, Houghton J, et al. Breast cancer in the elderly women: a cancer research. Campaign trial comparing treatment whit tamoxifen and optimal surgery with tamoxifen alone. The Elderly Breast Cancer Working Party. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 591-594.

88. Dixon JM, Renshawl L, Bellamy C, et al. The effects of neoadjuvant anastrazol (Arimidex) on tumor volume. In postmenopausal women with breast cancer: a randomized double-blind single- center study. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 2229-2235.

89. Dixon JM, Love CD, Bellamy CO, et al. Letrozol as primary medical therapy for locally advanced and large operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 66: 191-199.

90. Miller WR, Dixon JM. Endocrine and clinical endpoints of exemestane as neoadjuvant therapy. Cancer Control 2002; 9 (2 Suppl): 9-15.

91. Gil Gil MJ, Barandas A, Cirera L, et al. Primary hormonal therapy with exemestane in patients with breast tumors >3 cm in diameter: result of a spanish multicenter phase II trial. Proc ASCO 2004; 23; 7 abst 603.

92. Ellis Mattew J, Coop Andrew; Singh Mauriac, et al. Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for Erb B-1- and/or Erb B-2- positive, estrogen receptor positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol, 2001; 19: 3808-3816.

93. Ellis MJ. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: medical perspectives. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 4388s-91s discussion 4411s-2s.

94. Sánchez R, Duarte C, Perry F, et al. Open-study evaluation of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. Proc ASCO 2001; 21 abst 2034.

95. Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov V, Ivanov V, et al. The relative efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy vs chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with ER- positive breast cancer. Proc ASCO 2004; 23; 7 abst 519.

96. Buzdar AU, Valero V, Theriault RL, et al. Pathological complete response to chemotherapy is related to hormone receptor status. Breast Can Res Treat 2003; (suppl 1): S69. Abst 302.

97. Early Breast Cancer Trialists «Collaborative Group. tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists» Collaborative Group. Lancet 1998; 341: 1451-1467.

98. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1371-1388.

99. Commings SR, Eckert S, Krueger KA, et al. The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results from the MORE randomized trial. Multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation. JAMA 1999; 281: 2189-2197.

100. Veronesi U, Maisonneuve P, Costa A, et al. Prevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen: preliminary findings from the Italian randomized trial among hysterectomized women. Italian Tamoxifen Prevention Study. Lancet 1998; 352: 93-97.

101. Powles T, Eeles R, Ashley S, et al. Interim analysis of the incidence of breast Cancer in the Royal Marsden Hospital tamoxifen randomized chemoprevention trial. Lancet 1998; 352: 98-101.

102. Cuzick J, Forbes J, Edwards R, et al. First results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS 1): a randomized prevention trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 817-824.

103. Chlebowski RT, Collyar DE, Somerfield MR, Pfister DG. American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology assessment on breast cancer risk reduction strategies: tamoxifen and raloxifene. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1939-1955.

104. King MC, Wieand S, Hale K, et al. Tamoxifen and breast cancer and incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2: National Surgical Adyuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP - P 1) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. JAMA 2001; 286: 2251-2256.

105. Chlebowski RT, Col N, Winer EP, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic intervention for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3328-3343.

106. Salith AK, Fentiman IS. Breast cancer prevention: present and future. Cancer Treat Rev 2001; 27: 261-273.

107. Schrag D, Kuntz KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC. Decision analysis- effects of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy on life expectancy among women with BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations «comment» «erratum appears in N England J Med 1997; 337: 434». N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1465-1471.

108. Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutation. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1609-1615.

109. The ATAC Trialists Group. Arimidex taoic. Anastrozole along or in combination with tamoxifen vs tamoxifen along for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2131-2139.

110. Paul E. Goss and Katrin Strasser. Tamoxifen resistant and refractary breast cancer. The value of aromatase inhibitors. Drugs 2002: 62 (6): 957-966.

111. Vogel Charles. Update on the current use of hormonals as therapy in advanced breast cancer. Anticancer drugs. 14: 265-273. 2003. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

112. Vogel UG. Breast cancer prevention: a review of current evidence. Cancer J Clin 2000; 50: 156-170.

113. Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, et al. Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1 or Erb-2 positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence form a phase III randomized trial. J. Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3808-3816.

114. Pritchard K. Use of ErbB-2 to select endocrine therapy for breast cancer: will it play in Peoria? J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3795-3797.

115. Dixon JM, Renshaw L, et al. The effects of neoadjuvant anastrozole (arimidex) on tumor volume in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Res 2000; 6: 2229-2235.

116. Dixon JM, Anderson T, et al. Phase IIb study of neoadjuvant exemestane (EXE) in locally advanced breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001; 20: 406 (abst 1908).

117. The ATAC trialist group. Beneficial side- effect profile of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen confirmed by additional 7 months of exposure data: a safety update from the arimidex, tamoxifen, alone or in combination (ATAC) trial. Proc San Antonio Breast Cancer Symp 2002.

118. Mila Santos A, Milla L, Portella J, et al. The ATAC (arimidex, tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer-update efficacy results based on a median follow up of 47 months. Proc. San Antonio breast cancer symp 2002.

119. Dirix L, Piccart MJ, Lohrisch C, et al. Efficacy of and tolerance to examenstane (e) versus tamoxifen (T) in 1st line hormone therapy (HT) of postmenopausal metastasic breast cancer (MBC) patients: European Organization for the Research ant treatment on cancer (EORTC Breast Group) phase II trial with pharmacia and Upjohn. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001; 21: 29a.

120. Robertson J, Buzdar A, Nabholtz J, et al. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women-prospective combined analysis from two international trials. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: S88.

121. Nabholtz JM, Buzdar, et al. Anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen as first line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results of North America multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3758-3767.

122. Aron Goldhrish, William C, et al. Meeting Higlights: Update international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21: 3357-3365 2003 by ASCO.

123. Harper Wyne C, Ross G, Sacks N, et al. Effects of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in healthy postmenopausal women: rationale for prevention. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001; 20: 3356 (abstr 3091).

124. Ellis MJ, Coop A, et al. Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1 and or ERbB-2 positive, estrogen receptor positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3808-3816.

125. Wright C, Nicholson S, et al. Relationship between c-erbB-2 protein product expression and response to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1992; 65: 118-121.

126. Winer E, Hudis C, Burstein H, Chlebowski R, Ingle J, Edge S. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2002. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3317-3327.

127. Pietras RJ, et al. Oncogene 1995; 10: 2435-2446.

128. Charles A, Coltman MD. Phase II randomized study of celecoxib in premenopausal women at high risk for developing breast cancer. San Antonio Cancer Institute.

129. Sauter, Edwuard R. Celecoxib in women at increased breast cancer Risk. Missouri Univ. Columbia.

130. San Diego, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Miami: Celecoxib in treating women with metastasic or recurrent breast cancer. At Acurian.

131. Mezquita, C. (2001) Antiangiogénesis, en proliferación celular y cáncer 2000. Real Academia de Farmacia y fundación Científica de la AECC, Madrid.

132. Reynolds LE, Wyder L, Lively JC, Taverna D, Robinson SD, Huang, et al. Enhanced pathological angiogenesis in mice lacking beta 3 integrin or beta 3 and beta5 integrins. Nat Med 2002; 8: 27-37.

133. Baselga J, Rischin D, et al. Phase I Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic Trial of ZD1839 (Iressa) a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with five selected solid tumor types (submitted).

134. Hidalgo, N, Siu LL, Nemunaitis, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of OSI-774 an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19 (13): 3267-3279.

135. Adams J, Palombella V, et al. Proteasome inhibition: a new strategy in cancer treatment. Invest New drugs 2000; 18: 109-121.

136. Robledo JF, Caicedo JJ, DE Antonio R. Análisis de sobrevida en una cohorte de 1.328 pacientes. Rev Colomb de Cir 2005; 20: 4-20.

137. Ramírez G. Cáncer mamario, manejo hormonal. Rev Colomb Cancer 39-53.

138. Patiño JF. Lecciones de cirugía. Capítulo 7-6, 2000; 375-402.

139. Abaúnza H, Castro C. Cancer mamario. Segunda edición. Cap 14, 1997.

140. Vogel VG, et al. Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes. The NSABP Study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial. JAMA 2006; 295: 2727-2741.

141. Bevilacqua G, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 69: 226. Abstract 139.

142. Goldhirsch A, et al. Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. Sta Gallen Consensus. Annals of Oncol; Sept 7, 2005: 1-15.

143. Coombes, et al. ASCO 2006 proceedings.

144. Fallowfield, et al. Quality of life in IES subprotocl. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 910-917.

145. Winner EP, et al. ASCO technology assessment en the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for post menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Status report 2004. JCO Jan 2005.

Descargas

Publicado

2007-03-20

Cómo citar

(1)
Caicedo M., J. J.; Quintero, E.; Robledo, J. F.; Perry, F.; Ramírez, C.; Duarte, C.; Ángel, J.; Díaz, S.; Orozco, A.; Viaña, L. F. Cáncer De Seno Y Hormonoterapia. Estado Actual. Rev Colomb Cir 2007, 22, 47-71.

Número

Sección

Artículo de Revisión

Métricas

QR Code

Algunos artículos similares: